Izotope vs clickrepair2/3/2024 u/Schematic_Sound pitched in: check their comment (not copy pasting cause it's longer).Every tool it has can generally be done better in a purpose-built plugin or piece of hardware. /u/devinkerr says: I’m a mastering engineer.Happy to sticky the response by an actual mastering engineer when they come.ĮDIT: So, it would seem I can't sticky responses by other people, so I'll just add them here: I don't know a single professional mastering engineer who would use Ozone as their primary tool. So what OP is really asking: I'm curious if any career mastering engineers actually primarily stick with Ozone? There are more accurate EQs, compressors, LIMITERS! wideners, better reverbs, exciters than what Ozone has. Sure, why not?īut does a mastering engineer receives a project, stretches their fingers and pops Ozone open to get to work? Not to my knowledge. But in my over 15 years doing this, it's far from what I've seen.Ĭould mastering engineers use Ozone? Absolutely, especially using the individual modules because they like the processing of that particular unit and they think it may fit well with whatever project they are working on. I mean, some might, who am I to know intimately what everyone uses. So do professional mastering engineers who do this at a high enough level to have a mastering room with full range monitoring use Ozone as their main tool for doing their work? Of course not. Professional engineers think "Ozone = Processing", just like anything else. The bedroom production world thinks "Ozone = Mastering". Ozone is pure marketing, despite it being actually a pretty good plugin. Okay, I feel the need to sticky this since no actual mastering engineers has showed up yet, and the top responses are "I'm not a mastering engineer but.". Helps us keep the sub clean by reporting posts and comments that are in fault. Check out the rest of them before posting and learn more behind their reason to be: NO LINK DUMPING FOR SELF PROMOTION (use a text post instead, introduce yourself, don't be spam-y, be transparent)īreaking any of these rules will result in your post being instantly deleted and repeated offenses will result in your banning.NO RATES/BUDGETS ON THE SUB (in posts or comments).Have questions about mixing? Would like feedback on your track? You've come to the right place.įor questions about recording, gear troubleshooting and nearly everything else that doesn't involve mixing, try: /r/audioengineering (that's the core professional audio community on reddit) Thanks.A marketplace to search for and offer mixing and mastering services (separately). Topic - LP Transfer Click Repair Software - ClickRepair vs iZotope RX 8 - newvinyl 09:54:04 08/02/21 Support of people like you and our sponsors: This post is made possible by the generous Tascam DA-3000 at Sweetwater (Open in New Window) Currently, I use a TASCAM DA-3000 DSD recorder and I copy all my records in DSD128 for maximum fidelity. Anyway, I'm perfectly happy to simply record my records without any post processing other than splitting each record side into individual tracks. They sound this way when playing the records and my digital recordings sound the same. Even without repairing these clicks and pops, my digital recordings are very quiet and noise free. If you have a good turntable and clean records, there will be very little surface noise. I've digitized hundreds of records since I bought my first digital recorder in 1991 and I've never used a click removal program. RE: LP Transfer Click Repair Software - ClickRepair vs iZotope RX 8 posted by ecl876 Posted by John Elison ( A) on Augat 03:10:29 RE: LP Transfer Click Repair Software - ClickRepair vs iZotope RX 8
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |